Copenhagen Question.

[Westoverfd55]

I have been looking into purchasing Copenhagen but have been kind of scared off with all the poor performance questions. All I have installed on my pc is Flytampa products, ASN and FTX. I am running a 3.4 gig processor with 16gb of ram, also use the PMDG 777 have had no problems with any other FT scenery but am gun shy hearing about all the performance issues from others in the forums. Any help from others that are having good results and input on how may pc may handle it would be appreciated.

[mas618]

Running p3d v2.4 on win7x64 with an i2500k @ 4,3 ghz, 8 GB ram, a 660ti. Orbx Global /vector/EU Landclas. This is from memory; autogen is normal, cloud shadows and terrain shadows at 20.000, building shadows cast/receive, cockpit shadows is on, autogen shadows cast, tessellation is medium/normal, scenery complexity all right, water is medium, texture resolution 10 cm. No AI, very little car traffic.

3d grass is off, 3d lights is off, all AES traffic obviously off, no animated betrays, everything else is normal/medium.

Only using the Aerosoft Airbus, and I have a very fluid and smooth experience. Compared to other addon airports, that don't even resemble the amount of city/surrounding areas modelled, this scenery is even better frame pr frame comparison....

Hands down the best performing airport I own, beats Jo Erland /Aerosoft Oslo v2 by a fraction...

Mas

[fjacobsen]

Performance for me is quite good compared to other addon airports.
Only problem is it´s impact on VAS, which might get You very near an OOM using the PMDG 737 NGX or 777.

FinnJ