OK all you KATL wishers.. here's your chance..
skydvdan wrote:LMAO!!!ShamirF wrote:DJMilo101 wrote:Would you look at that FlyTampa, someone beat you too it. You guys will regret every second that you realize how stupid you were not to make KATL.
mate... if flytampa does Ranger Creek aif"field" more people will buy it than the Image Sim ATL
I'd like to see how that would play out.
I have the georender one xd
no more than 2 or 3 houses, some vehicles and some more things xd really nice thou for me as a Busher pilot

anyways... im glad with wotever Flytampa does



Shamir Fersobe
- deltaboeing84
- Posts: 368
RELEASED IMAGINE SIM PAGE
For FS2004 only right now.ShamirF wrote:RELEASED IMAGINE SIM PAGE
- Kyle Joseph
- Posts: 80
Considering who designed the scenery (and he has improved a LOT but old habits are hard to break) I'll bet the 294 overpass looks like ass and isn't particularly photogenic. It's probably either totally flat with just some GIS imagery painted on the floor, or else it looks really fake.Kyle Joseph wrote:is there a fifth runway??
there are no pictures of this in the scenery.
If anyone in possession of the scenery (or demo?) cares to prove me wrong...
i am in a couple of virtual airlines, SWA, ATA, and Delta, so i was really looking forward to this airport due to Delta hub, but i never got past the demo and would not consider this worthy of purchase. i also could not figure out why i have not seen many pictures of it on all the screenshot forums i go to (could it be due to its lack of quality). Now i am not in the least saying that it is not good in its own right, but if you have read any of my recent posts, after the demo of KATL, i went a did a short taxi around KMDW from FlyTampa, and wow, no comparision...just none. really disapointing. none of it looks photogenic so to speak, just flat flat flat, not convincing at all.
That's the difference between a company that cranks out the airports fast, and one like Flytampa that takes longer but produces a much better product. I can't figure out when Martin has time to sleep with the amount of work that goes into his products,ATAvPilot wrote:i am in a couple of virtual airlines, SWA, ATA, and Delta, so i was really looking forward to this airport due to Delta hub, but i never got past the demo and would not consider this worthy of purchase. i also could not figure out why i have not seen many pictures of it on all the screenshot forums i go to (could it be due to its lack of quality). Now i am not in the least saying that it is not good in its own right, but if you have read any of my recent posts, after the demo of KATL, i went a did a short taxi around KMDW from FlyTampa, and wow, no comparision...just none. really disapointing. none of it looks photogenic so to speak, just flat flat flat, not convincing at all.