OK all you KATL wishers.. here's your chance..

flysiu
Posts: 77

Post by flysiu » Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:08 pm

Wow, by a landslide too. That was a beatdown...
skydvdan
Posts: 2121

Post by skydvdan » Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:06 pm

Dimon wrote:Hope Dan should be lucky either. :D
???
ShamirF
Posts: 129

Post by ShamirF » Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:40 pm

skydvdan wrote:
ShamirF wrote:
DJMilo101 wrote:Would you look at that FlyTampa, someone beat you too it. You guys will regret every second that you realize how stupid you were not to make KATL.

mate... if flytampa does Ranger Creek aif"field" more people will buy it than the Image Sim ATL
LMAO!!!

I'd like to see how that would play out. :wink:

I have the georender one xd

no more than 2 or 3 houses, some vehicles and some more things xd really nice thou for me as a Busher pilot :)


anyways... im glad with wotever Flytampa does :) :wink: 8)



Shamir Fersobe
deltaboeing84
Posts: 368

Post by deltaboeing84 » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:27 pm

Altanta won by a crap load. FYI.
altstiff
Posts: 220

Post by altstiff » Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:14 pm

It's my first IS scenery and I liked it so much I picked up KMCI and KCLT too.

Not FT good but still well done.
ShamirF
Posts: 129

Post by ShamirF » Sun May 18, 2008 6:43 pm

skydvdan
Posts: 2121

Post by skydvdan » Sun May 18, 2008 7:59 pm

ShamirF wrote:RELEASED IMAGINE SIM PAGE
For FS2004 only right now.
_Dre_
Posts: 302

Post by _Dre_ » Mon May 19, 2008 10:26 am

I gotta say I like it a lot. It's my first IS scenery without framerate issues on my machine despite it's ginormous size. They are improving with each scenery and that's all you can ask really.

Job well done Imaginesim.
NWarty
Posts: 24

Post by NWarty » Mon May 19, 2008 10:38 am

Agreed Dre,

I picked it up Saturday morning and have to say that I really like it. I was a little gunshy about Imaginesim sinced I had never purchased any of their sceneries. But your right, they seem to really build on their experience with each airport.

Great job ImagineSim.
B777ER
Posts: 393

Post by B777ER » Thu May 22, 2008 11:39 pm

I like the attention to detail in the jetways. Notice the simulated lights on the control panel near the tarmac...nice touch.
Kyle Joseph
Posts: 80

Post by Kyle Joseph » Fri May 23, 2008 5:00 pm

is there a fifth runway??

there are no pictures of this in the scenery.
tjsynkral
Posts: 86

Post by tjsynkral » Fri May 23, 2008 7:09 pm

Kyle Joseph wrote:is there a fifth runway??

there are no pictures of this in the scenery.
Considering who designed the scenery (and he has improved a LOT but old habits are hard to break) I'll bet the 294 overpass looks like ass and isn't particularly photogenic. It's probably either totally flat with just some GIS imagery painted on the floor, or else it looks really fake.

If anyone in possession of the scenery (or demo?) cares to prove me wrong...
ATAvPilot
Posts: 43

Post by ATAvPilot » Fri May 23, 2008 7:36 pm

i am in a couple of virtual airlines, SWA, ATA, and Delta, so i was really looking forward to this airport due to Delta hub, but i never got past the demo and would not consider this worthy of purchase. i also could not figure out why i have not seen many pictures of it on all the screenshot forums i go to (could it be due to its lack of quality). Now i am not in the least saying that it is not good in its own right, but if you have read any of my recent posts, after the demo of KATL, i went a did a short taxi around KMDW from FlyTampa, and wow, no comparision...just none. really disapointing. none of it looks photogenic so to speak, just flat flat flat, not convincing at all.
paavo
Posts: 1612

Post by paavo » Fri May 23, 2008 7:55 pm

ATAvPilot wrote:i am in a couple of virtual airlines, SWA, ATA, and Delta, so i was really looking forward to this airport due to Delta hub, but i never got past the demo and would not consider this worthy of purchase. i also could not figure out why i have not seen many pictures of it on all the screenshot forums i go to (could it be due to its lack of quality). Now i am not in the least saying that it is not good in its own right, but if you have read any of my recent posts, after the demo of KATL, i went a did a short taxi around KMDW from FlyTampa, and wow, no comparision...just none. really disapointing. none of it looks photogenic so to speak, just flat flat flat, not convincing at all.
That's the difference between a company that cranks out the airports fast, and one like Flytampa that takes longer but produces a much better product. I can't figure out when Martin has time to sleep with the amount of work that goes into his products,
Post Reply