Really? The early sceneries I agree with you but the later ones are pretty good._Dre_ wrote:LOL, Buuuurrrrrnnnnnn!!!!!skydvdan wrote:You should be like the other guy and buy a copy for everyone in your VA.DJMilo101 wrote:I just believe that FlyTampa should have come in before ImagineSim. I like FlyTampa better than Imaginesim.
BTW: I fly for Delta Virtual Airlines www.deltava.org and our whole VA has voted for ATL. I can promise you that ATL will wind
I'm glad Imaginesim didn't do KJFK, I don't think their sceneries are frames friendly.
OK all you KATL wishers.. here's your chance..
I don't have them all; just klga, kewr, kden, kmci, kcvg. LGA and EWR get a pass because of location, but I'm getting the same frames at the rest as I get at Aerosoft's MA Frankfurt, which is barely flyable(to the point where I have to pause my sim on short final when the airport is loading).
Then again I am running a pentium4 so maybe I need a new pc.
Then again I am running a pentium4 so maybe I need a new pc.
Hmmm, because I get great fps at KLGA, KCVG and KCLT. The biggest hit I get at KEWR._Dre_ wrote:I don't have them all; just klga, kewr, kden, kmci, kcvg. LGA and EWR get a pass because of location, but I'm getting the same frames at the rest as I get at Aerosoft's MA Frankfurt, which is barely flyable(to the point where I have to pause my sim on short final when the airport is loading).
Then again I am running a pentium4 so maybe I need a new pc.
- tbmavengerstuka
- Posts: 118
- tbmavengerstuka
- Posts: 118
- deltaboeing84
- Posts: 368
LMAO!!!ShamirF wrote:DJMilo101 wrote:Would you look at that FlyTampa, someone beat you too it. You guys will regret every second that you realize how stupid you were not to make KATL.
mate... if flytampa does Ranger Creek aif"field" more people will buy it than the Image Sim ATL
I'd like to see how that would play out.
