Denver

[CSTT-KLAS]

For you next airport http://denverurbanism.com/

thanks

[cosnowboarder_777]

Thats pretty cool, I had no idea that they were planning a redevelopment for DIA looks nice.

[juniormafia27]

Oh yeah that has been in the works. Another reason why you should do that airport

[tictac_]

I agree!

I've been looking to buy a great DIA addon for ages. I cannot believe it hasn't been done yet (the ones out there are mediocre at best).

With 52+ million passengers a year (11th in the world), a major hub for Frontier Airlines, United and Southwest and its steadily growing number of international flights, I think it's about time.

If you decide to do it, please include Denver downtown and its new Union Station area plus the terminal expansion at DIA. Both are currently U/C.


South Terminal Redevelopment:
http://business.flydenver.com/bizops/so ... /index.asp (info)
http://www.gensler.com/#projects/378 (architect and renderings)

Denver Union Station Redevelopment:
http://www.denverunionstation.org/ (info and renderings etc)
http://www.denverinfill.com (blog w/ updates)

Pictures

DIA





Downtown

[davidmool]

cool

[CX 747-400]

WOW.... someone had to go digging for an posting from 2013.

If you want a great version of Denver, go over to Flightbeam... https://www.flightbeam.net/kden.html/

[george[flytampa]]

It was just a bot

[Elliot Negrón]

@CX 747-400

How rude of you to brazenly link to competitors work like that! A certain degree of respect is given to the developers here, please ensure you conduct yourself in a respectful manner. I am sure that you wouldn't want someone to come to your house and boast how good their own house is etc.

[george[flytampa]]

@CX 747-400

How rude of you to brazenly link to competitors work like that! A certain degree of respect is given to the developers here, please ensure you conduct yourself in a respectful manner. I am sure that you wouldn't want someone to come to your house and boast how good their own house is etc.

Its fine. We get on really well with Flightbeam.

[Elliot Negrón]

Its fine. We get on really well with Flightbeam.
[/quote]

Okay sure but CX 747-400 should definitely show a bit more respect here, err on the side of caution etc.

[scotth6]

Its fine. We get on really well with Flightbeam.

Okay sure but CX 747-400 should definitely show a bit more respect here, err on the side of caution etc.
[/quote]

Mate, if FlyTampa even had a version of Denver then I would understand your concern, but they don't.

[CX 747-400]

@CX 747-400

How rude of you to brazenly link to competitors work like that! A certain degree of respect is given to the developers here, please ensure you conduct yourself in a respectful manner. I am sure that you wouldn't want someone to come to your house and boast how good their own house is etc.

Elliott,

I am guessing that you are new to the flight sim community. We are one giant community that helps out each other. What if the person that I was responding to had never heard of Flight Beam, and was stuck using default scenery, and was begging and pleading for a quality scenery to be made when it already exists.

There is nothing "rude" with telling someone about a great product on another developers website. It is not like FlyTampa has a Denver product available or has announced one. I would do the same thing on any other developers website if there was another product available elsewhere.

And, by the way, I have shown FlyTampa plenty of respect in the best way possible.... I own almost all of the sceneries that they have made since 2006. Can you say that?