Battle of the Airports
- precious62b
- Posts: 41
- FlySanJose
- Posts: 197
- MD11Forever
- Posts: 305
- crash_continental
- Posts: 10
- MD11Forever
- Posts: 305
Thanks for explaining this to folks. I only brought this thread back up to show what has happened in the last couple of years.MD11Forever wrote:You can't vote, was closed a long time ago. The poll is from 2004.crash_continental wrote:Err... feel stupid on this one, but...
How do I vote here?
P.S. I'd vote for KLAX because it's an important airport that hasn't been done well yet. (cloud9's is a FPS killer)
Oh shi....,skydvdan wrote:Check the date of the post. LOL!!!
You right I should pay more attention to the dates of some posts.
But it would be a very good idea, if flytampa could start this kind of market research again.
I am for Sydney International or Auckland International.
Nevertheless, FlyTampa start such a poll again please!!!
Bye
JoMoRo
- FlySanJose
- Posts: 197
- MD11Forever
- Posts: 305
Must be the subliminal message.FlySanJose wrote:So in the next poll, I shouldn't vote for the airport I wanna see get done?MD11Forever wrote:Ironic that the airport with the lowest number of votes in the poll (zero) wound up being done by Fly Tampa.![]()
In that case, I absolutely, positively, never ever in my entire life, want to see PANC. *
*satire, not an actual request.
- shamir fersobe
- Posts: 12
" CLOSED " Got me too. In that case I wonder why there is not a post to that, CLOSED. I did notice that the POLL counter did not work, not knowing if it did in the first place, so, like others, I posted my vote for manual compiliation,
Someone is getting some chuckles from this. More than happy to help in that regard.
Have a nice day!!!!!

Someone is getting some chuckles from this. More than happy to help in that regard.
Have a nice day!!!!!
