Minneapolis St. Paul - KMSP

[BAILBONDSH]

Hey guys, I am looking for a scenery for KMSP. This is my airport and as much as I dislike Delta, I like this airport quite a lot. Firstly, yes I have seen the Bueprint KMSP scenery, and it is drop dead awful . But yeah also, if anyone has the power to convince FlyTampa to make this airport I will pay BIG BUCKS for it. Also, if you could maybe help me find a CYYC airport scenery, that would be awesome too, considering how poorly of a job Microsoft did when modleing the default one.

Thanks to all.

[marvic]

I would say you have hit the nail on the head with your request. Lets hope someone is listening.

[Deltaguy]

Hey, what do you have against Delta? It's a great airline which took much of the Northwest policies and re-branded it into the Delta name. I would also love to see a KMSP for FSX and FS9!

[High Iron]

There are no current CYYC sceneries available. There was an old one done ages ago for FS9 that people got to work in FSX, but I don't believe you can purchase an unlock key for it anymore. CYYC is in the process of some major changes with expansion of the main terminal, a new hotel, replaced Control Tower, and a whole new east runway with associated taxiways with tunnel underpasses. The changes are near completion and should be done early 2014.

Once the construction dust has settled it will be easier for a developer to collect the necessary data for a accurate rendition should a extreme quality airport developer choose to do it.

Cheers,
Thad

[jhaley101]

Wrong. There of course is a CYYC for FSX. Read about it, purchase it at.....

http://simaddons.com/support

It contains the upgrades and future development plans.

The author is working on CYEG right now.

JH

[marvic]

Not everyone is a fan of Simaddons and certainly do NOT want to be forced to buy CYHZ Halifax to make it work.

[High Iron]

Wrong. There of course is a CYYC for FSX. Read about it, purchase it at.....

http://simaddons.com/support

It contains the upgrades and future development plans.

The author is working on CYEG right now.

JH

Hmmm, odd. It's not posted on his "add-ons" page at his web site. Either way, although I encourage his work and efforts, the textures are some way behind what most popular developers are using to date.

[deltaboeing84]

Hey, I've got an idea. Why don't developers develop scenery that hasn't been done before instead of re-doing scenery that other developers have. There are plenty of airports left...

[SpeedbirdATC]

Like KSEA ? everybody else: AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[High Iron]

Hey, I've got an idea. Why don't developers develop scenery that hasn't been done before instead of re-doing scenery that other developers have. There are plenty of airports left...

Translation: Stop developing airports I'm not interested in and focus on ones that "I" am...

It's real simple sir. It's the same reason there are multiple productions of the same aircraft. Some do things better or differently than others that consumers like. According to your statement, if Abacus made every popular aircraft that is in demand by simmers today, companies such as PMDG, Captain Sim, Aerosoft, Milvez, etc. etc., should just move on. I could just imagine, "Hmm, Abacus made the B787 and A350, well I guess those are done now. Other developers will have to find something else to do". This, by your statement, is your logic

[deltaboeing84]

Hey, I've got an idea. Why don't developers develop scenery that hasn't been done before instead of re-doing scenery that other developers have. There are plenty of airports left...

Translation: Stop developing airports I'm not interested in and focus on ones that "I" am...

It's real simple sir. It's the same reason there are multiple productions of the same aircraft. Some do things better or differently than others that consumers like. According to your statement, if Abacus made every popular aircraft that is in demand by simmers today, companies such as PMDG, Captain Sim, Aerosoft, Milvez, etc. etc., should just move on. I could just imagine, "Hmm, Abacus made the B787 and A350, well I guess those are done now. Other developers will have to find something else to do". This, by your statement, is your logic

There is no translation needed. I meant what I said THE WAY I SAID IT. There are a lot more airports, than aircraft, that have no scenery. I don't make requests, so your "Translation" is flawed.

Some of you need to quit your whining. If you want a scenery, make it yourself.

[High Iron]

Hey, I've got an idea. Why don't developers develop scenery that hasn't been done before instead of re-doing scenery that other developers have. There are plenty of airports left...

Sounds like whining to me, hence my reply.

I read the previous posts, and aside from yours see no others whining, just personal statements and opinions minus the sarcasm. Your last statement in your post only further highlights this fact.

I, like you, don't make requests either, but there are still airports we want... Much can be said of that which we do not say than that of which we do. Your statement I quoted above had nothing to do with the topic in discussion.

Cheers,
Thad

[deltaboeing84]

Hey, I've got an idea. Why don't developers develop scenery that hasn't been done before instead of re-doing scenery that other developers have. There are plenty of airports left...

Sounds like whining to me, hence my reply.

I read the previous posts, and aside from yours see no others whining, just personal statements and opinions minus the sarcasm. Your last statement in your post only further highlights this fact.

I, like you, don't make requests either, but there are still airports we want... Much can be said of that which we do not say than that of which we do. Your statement I quoted above had nothing to do with the topic in discussion.

Cheers,
Thad

You're right, it didn't have anything to do with the comment. I could careless, too. You said that my post was the only one that was "whining", well, I went back and read the other posts and saw some whining. I suggest you do the same.

MSP has been done. Deal with it.

[marvic]

Hey, I've got an idea. Why don't developers develop scenery that hasn't been done before instead of re-doing scenery that other developers have. There are plenty of airports left...

Sounds like whining to me, hence my reply.

I read the previous posts, and aside from yours see no others whining, just personal statements and opinions minus the sarcasm. Your last statement in your post only further highlights this fact.

I, like you, don't make requests either, but there are still airports we want... Much can be said of that which we do not say than that of which we do. Your statement I quoted above had nothing to do with the topic in discussion.

Cheers,
Thad

You're right, it didn't have anything to do with the comment. I could careless, too. You said that my post was the only one that was "whining", well, I went back and read the other posts and saw some whining. I suggest you do the same.

MSP has been done. Deal with it.

This is a FLYTAMPA general forum. It is not up to you to moderate anyone's scenery requests to FlyTampa. Now I recommend you DEAL with it.