What about Newark Liberty International Airport

[member111333]

What about Newark Liberty International Airport. Would be a nice combination with "Manhattan X". We could do our approaches with the amazing New York skyline in view. And the airport is relatively small in size compared to the other big hubs.

Cheers

[swajc]

Ditto!

[skydvdan]

Yeah it would be awesome to see those framerates dip down into the single digits in that framepit. No thanks.

[tri tri]

Yeah it would be awesome to see those framerates dip down into the single digits in that framepit. No thanks.

How did fsdreateam make kjfk with good frames? It is possible to make it right.

[member111333]

Yeah it would be awesome to see those framerates dip down into the single digits in that framepit. No thanks.

How did fsdreateam make kjfk with good frames? It is possible to make it right.

I use Manhattan X, PMDG Md11 and FSDT KJFK with very dense autogen and clouds with good fps. And I only have an ATI 5870. Never seen single digits with my I7 920. Not necessary to run everything at extremely dense.

[skydvdan]

Yeah it would be awesome to see those framerates dip down into the single digits in that framepit. No thanks.

How did fsdreateam make kjfk with good frames? It is possible to make it right.

I use Manhattan X, PMDG Md11 and FSDT KJFK with very dense autogen and clouds with good fps. And I only have an ATI 5870. Never seen single digits with my I7 920. Not necessary to run everything at extremely dense.

And now you want to add another 500,000 polygons. I'm sure you'll see single digits then. Ask some of the people that have all the sceries around the Chicago area.

[member111333]

"And now you want to add another 500,000 polygons. I'm sure you'll see single digits then. Ask some of the people that have all the sceries around the Chicago area."

Manhattan X is compared to Aerosoft Chicago in a different league when it comes to fps. Especially the latest patch for Manhattan X boosted the performance quite a bit. Even with fsx default scenery with UTX (if s.b. has problems with fps) it should be a beautiful approach with the buildings in view . Due to its extraordinary location I would rather have Newark than maybe JFK. In maybe one year we will fly this area in a "below midrange computer" at almost everything extremly dense.

[skydvdan]

In maybe one year we will fly this area in a "below midrange computer" at almost everything extremly dense.

Based on what? Increase in computing power or the release of Microsoft Flight? Either way I'm going to disagree.

[member111333]

In maybe one year we will fly this area in a "below midrange computer" at almost everything extremly dense.

Based on what? Increase in computing power or the release of Microsoft Flight? Either way I'm going to disagree.

Computing power. Just try out FT Kai Tak in Fs9 maxed out. Completely smooth. In one to two years we will fly that in fsx with +100fps (now 20fps with MD11 at very dense on final approach). Who would have thought it would be ever possible to create such a complex scenery like Kaitak for fsx working so smooth.