16R and 34L additions???

[Brendan9011]

Seriously, we need to have the new runways for FlyTampa Seattle. Its becoming quite annoying and I'm thinking about going back to the default scenery so that I can have the new runways.

Please guys, you really need to make this addition.

[paavo]

Seriously, we need to have the new runways for FlyTampa Seattle. Its becoming quite annoying and I'm thinking about going back to the default scenery so that I can have the new runways.

Please guys, you really need to make this addition.

LOL, the default doesn't have the new runways, and George has already answered questions about this, I suggest you use the search function.

[skydvdan]

Seriously, we need to have the new runways for FlyTampa Seattle. Its becoming quite annoying and I'm thinking about going back to the default scenery so that I can have the new runways.

Please guys, you really need to make this addition.

LOL, the default doesn't have the new runways, and George has already answered questions about this, I suggest you use the search function.

Funny how we just talked about this "issue".

[skydvdan]

Seriously, we need to have the new runways for FlyTampa Seattle. Its becoming quite annoying and I'm thinking about going back to the default scenery so that I can have the new runways.

Please guys, you really need to make this addition.

Look dude, you have to understand that a scenery is a snapshot in time. Most developers aren't going to make changes and updates everytime something happens at an airport. That could literally be a full time job. When you look at the changes to SEATAC you'll see that an update to the FT scenery wouldn't be a small undertaking. If you have to go back to the default scenery all you're doing is cheating yourself, but that's your call.

[flynman3]

Seriously, we need to have the new runways for FlyTampa Seattle. Its becoming quite annoying and I'm thinking about going back to the default scenery so that I can have the new runways.

Please guys, you really need to make this addition.

Look dude, you have to understand that a scenery is a snapshot in time. Most developers aren't going to make changes and updates everytime something happens at an airport. That could literally be a full time job. When you look at the changes to SEATAC you'll see that an update to the FT scenery wouldn't be a small undertaking. If you have to go back to the default scenery all you're doing is cheating yourself, but that's your call.

Look yourself DUDE.....YES the aerodrome has changed...No I do not expect a 16L/34R UPGRADE for free....I would not mind paying $5.00 for it either..I do not expect it for free or as an entitlement. It just would be nice to have wihout a whole new SEATAC.....More potential dollars for George...

[skydvdan]

Seriously, we need to have the new runways for FlyTampa Seattle. Its becoming quite annoying and I'm thinking about going back to the default scenery so that I can have the new runways.

Please guys, you really need to make this addition.

Look dude, you have to understand that a scenery is a snapshot in time. Most developers aren't going to make changes and updates everytime something happens at an airport. That could literally be a full time job. When you look at the changes to SEATAC you'll see that an update to the FT scenery wouldn't be a small undertaking. If you have to go back to the default scenery all you're doing is cheating yourself, but that's your call.

Look yourself DUDE.....YES the aerodrome has changed...No I do not expect a 16L/34R UPGRADE for free....I would not mind paying $5.00 for it either..I do not expect it for free or as an entitlement. It just would be nice to have wihout a whole new SEATAC.....More potential dollars for George...

Excuse me but who the f*ck are you? Don't "Look yourself DUDE" me. You weren't even part of the conversation and then you pull up this old ass post and mouth off at me like you were part of this? George probably doesn't give a f*ck about the dollars especially when you consider the amount of time this kind of "upgrade" takes to do. Where do you get the upgraded ground imagery? Do you know how to build up the mesh? Do you have updated source imagery for the whole area? These are just a few.

[flynman3]

Yes sir I do know how much time...6 hours cause since reading your clown post I have sat down and done it minus the the sat photo and looks almost seamless......sorry DUDE BUD I wont show you or anyone else till you change your tune..

bye bye

[skydvdan]

Yes sir I do know how much time...6 hours cause since reading your clown post I have sat down and done it minus the the sat photo and looks almost seamless......sorry DUDE BUD I wont show you or anyone else till you change your tune..

bye bye

I don't need to see your Crayola type work. In six hours I can assure you that it's a joke compared to the FlyTampa KSEA. Nice try though Cleatus.

[tbmavengerstuka]

Yes sir I do know how much time...6 hours cause since reading your clown post I have sat down and done it minus the the sat photo and looks almost seamless......sorry DUDE BUD I wont show you or anyone else till you change your tune..

bye bye

Eh, i doubt 6 hours would be enough to be on the same level as the surrounding scenery. put up a pic, i'm curious

[SDFlyer]

I for one would like to see what you've got put together. A quality upgrade is always welcome.

[skydvdan]

Yes sir I do know how much time...6 hours cause since reading your clown post I have sat down and done it minus the the sat photo and looks almost seamless......sorry DUDE BUD I wont show you or anyone else till you change your tune..

bye bye

Eh, i doubt 6 hours would be enough to be on the same level as the surrounding scenery. put up a pic, i'm curious

It's not.