Hi George,

These are some impressive shots! I look forward to its release. I do have a quick question for you. Will this scenery be compatible with Vista 64-bit? Earlier versions of the scenery were not, but I know you said this works with Win 7.

Thanks,

Jonathan

Can you say "X-Plane?"

Not that X-Plane is better than FSX, in most ways, but X-Plane really has come a long way. It just lacks a few crucial items, like AI Traffic. However I think the guys at Laminar Research are celebrating.

So... if you guys want it so bad, why not work together and get it done faster?

For what aircraft are you looking for repaints for?

Isn't spending time at the airport a good enough salary for you?

Eh, I guess it depends on which airport it is.

And, if I were you, I would like to be paid for that job as well. Sounds fun though.

Simflyer's put out a PHX, but it's a little out of date with the new terminal and such. It's decent, unless you're using FSX. I'm not sure if it's compatible or not.

It depends on the type of .BGL file. If it's an AFCAD .BGL, then you can use AFCAD to open it. It could be a traffic file, i.e. traffic_usairways.bgl, which is able to be compiled and decompiled by Lee Swordy's Traffic Tools. It's likely that it is a scenery file, which is created using gmax or a va...

martin[flytampa] wrote:The genius of our highly overpaid marketing bozos at work

You mean Dan Relfe?

Terrific shots. The first and the last in the chopper are amazing shots. Nice work (to you and Fly Tampa!)

Every time you guys are working hard on a new scenery and I'm attempting to guess where it is, I turn to your website. Yes, I see those planes flying around on the map. It's very misleading. It makes me think, "Ooo! That plane is landing in Tokyo, maybe that will be it!" Perhaps we should ...

I've heard from Mach-1 that this was going to take him quite some time. Any word on how far he is... or links? I've checked the forums at Avsim, where I've seen him before, and hadn't found anything.

Thanks,

I hope I still can. I haven't been to Kai Tak since FS98 and will be doing a lot of traffic patterns in the heavies before my first long haul. It would suck immensely to fly for 10 hrs only to crash into the checkered board because you are unfamiliar with how your T7 or A340 handles in a very sharp...

Now, I don't believe this can be changed, but can AI Traffic fly the correct approach into Kai Tak?

Simply Stunning