-
martin[flytampa]
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5290
Post
by martin[flytampa] » Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:52 pm
Doesn't surprise me much.... seeing that absolutely noone else is developing and shipping DX10 games right now
Next prediction: First generation DX10 cards will run slower then last generation DX9 cards. I certainly won't be running to the store to purchase any of the first boxes with DX10/Vista stickers on them.
PS: Dan, I like your choice of subject and use of fonts, would make a good tabloid reporter

-
skydvdan
- Posts: 2121
Post
by skydvdan » Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:16 pm
martin[flytampa] wrote:
PS: Dan, I like your choice of subject and use of fonts, would make a good tabloid reporter

I thought you'd get a kick out of that. For me this is like a huge "I told you so" to a lot of fanboys.

-
paavo
- Posts: 1612
Post
by paavo » Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:17 pm
Page 6 Blind Item:
Thousands of people will buy DX10 cards the day they come out and will be convinced that FSX runs and looks much better with DX10.
-
martin[flytampa]
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5290
Post
by martin[flytampa] » Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:37 pm
paavo wrote:Thousands of people will buy DX10 cards the day they come out and will be convinced that FSX runs and looks much better with DX10.
Yap, and if the framerate counter says otherwise, it'll just "feel" smoother, end of discussion.
-
Dimon
- Posts: 318
Post
by Dimon » Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:42 am
So, what's the bottomline? Go and buy CD2+I975 chipset system with mid-priced PCI card now and just wait for Vista.
-
skydvdan
- Posts: 2121
Post
by skydvdan » Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:56 pm
Dimon wrote:So, what's the bottomline? Go and buy CD2+I975 chipset system with mid-priced PCI card now and just wait for Vista.
I made my decision weeks ago when I upgraded my system. I don't really give a rat's ass about DX10. It's obvious that FSX was designed for DX9 because that's all that was available when it was created. How much difference can DX10 really make? Sure it'll make some but if you honestly think FSX is going to look like these artists conceptions that are floating around I think you're setting yourself up for failure and disappointment. Enjoy what you have. I got a system that I felt would run FSX at an acceptable rate. Every rendition of FS that has come out in the last few years has outpaced the available hardware so why would this one be any different?
-
Dimon
- Posts: 318
Post
by Dimon » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:10 pm
skydvdan wrote:Dimon wrote:So, what's the bottomline? Go and buy CD2+I975 chipset system with mid-priced PCI card now and just wait for Vista.
I made my decision weeks ago when I upgraded my system. I don't really give a rat's ass about DX10. It's obvious that FSX was designed for DX9 because that's all that was available when it was created. How much difference can DX10 really make? Sure it'll make some but if you honestly think FSX is going to look like these artists conceptions that are floating around I think you're setting yourself up for failure and disappointment. Enjoy what you have. I got a system that I felt would run FSX at an acceptable rate. Every rendition of FS that has come out in the last few years has outpaced the available hardware so why would this one be any different?
Perhaps, FSX "superb" performance under Vista is also bluff.
-
Jacek
- Posts: 319
Post
by Jacek » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:21 pm
Is anyone going to the AVSIM convention? If so, I'm sure MS will be asked sea of questions on sunday during their display.
-
skydvdan
- Posts: 2121
Post
by skydvdan » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:23 pm
Jacek wrote:Is anyone going to the AVSIM convention? If so, I'm sure MS will be asked sea of questions on sunday during their display.
Someone should ask them "WTF" about Taildraggers comments. As I read it they don't know what's going to happen after DX10 is implemented.

-
Dimon
- Posts: 318
Post
by Dimon » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:26 pm
Jacek wrote:Is anyone going to the AVSIM convention? If so, I'm sure MS will be asked sea of questions on sunday during their display.
These guys are very well trained to provide "general" answers to very narrowed and specific questions, so I don't expect any revelations at this point. At least, they may always refer to NDA.
-
paavo
- Posts: 1612
Post
by paavo » Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:28 pm
Here is another great quote from a dev that was posted at simflight.
JonP wrote:I have to say I am completely confused as to what sort of etiquette to follow as regards reporting problems. It's now almost impossible to know whether we will get shot down in flames by the ubiqituous FSX demo fanboys or thanked by MS because we've pointed out something they haven't seen.
Regards
A very confused Jon
-
martin[flytampa]
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5290
Post
by martin[flytampa] » Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:40 pm
Dimon wrote:So, what's the bottomline? Go and buy CD2+I975 chipset system with mid-priced PCI card now and just wait for Vista.
Depends what kind of "geek" you are

If you upgrade every 6-12 months it doesn't matter, if however you upgrade only every 24 + months I wouldn't buy anything right now.
-
A320fan
- Posts: 11
Post
by A320fan » Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:59 am
my PC is a pretty good one, so im keeping it the way it is for now. for all of you planning to upgadr to a DX10 card and Vista, i would wait at least six months. both will for sure have some kind of bug in them, so i would wait until both are perfected. the exact same thing happened to Windows XP when it first came out.