george[flytampa] wrote:Sales are very very poor compared to 4 years ago. Seattle sold 4.5 times the amount of Boston or Buffalo. Why I don't know; FSXs failure, shrinking spilt market
Right now Quebec(CYQB) & a new one, Graz, Austria(LOWG) are favourites.
Hi George,
I just read your comment and felt compelled to say something.
I think its hard to compare the well know destinations that were released between 2004 and 2008, with what has been released in the last two years. I mean between 2004 and 2008 you released some really popular solid destinations that many people wanted. Then as of late, besides the products that were redone to work in FSX like Vienna, St. Maarten, and Boston. you only have Hong Kong, the Grenadines and Buffalo which just came out. Even though I dont know your sales numbers I would bet that Hong Kong was a really good seller when compared to the Grenadines scenery.
You also state that Seattle sold 4.5 times the amount of Boston or Buffalo has. Well of course it has sold more that Buffalo since its been out since 2005. I wouldn't imagine that an airport that came out a week or two ago would outsell something that has already been on the market for 5 years now. Plus since Boston was an update to FS9 and new for FSX it would be hard to give as much credance to the FSX sales this soon and its hard to know how many FS9'ers have wanted to spend the additional for the update.
I don't know if it fair to say that sales are slow because of FSX being a failure, while a lot of other plane and scenery developers have been stating that FSX products are out selling their FS9 counter parts.
I have to admit that as a consumer and a big time fan of FlyTampa products, some of the products that have come out in the last two years I haven't been rushing out to get, namely the Grenadines since you cant fly airliners into any of the airports or Buffalo. Although I probably will buy Buffalo at some point, it's just not an airport that frankly I have ever given much thought to.
I can't count the amount of times I have read on this forum and other FS forums for that matter people begging for you guys to do updates of some of the older US sceneries, although now its probably to late for some of them since Flightbeam is wrapping up KSFO another outfit is working on KSAN and there has been recent activity between Junior of the former Intersim, LatinVFR, and FSDT of which one of them is going to eventually do or release KMIA.
Basically what I am trying to get at is why not start working on products that your customers are asking for? I understand that you guys want to do stuff that personally interests you, but at what point if you are really in business to make money do you decide to make what customers want or make stuff that you want and then hope that it sells well?
I would wager that if you guys developed a KPHX, KDEN, KIAH, or any number of other airports you see people constantly belly aching for, you would probably sell a reasonable amount to make it worth your while to do? Why not do a poll and ask your customers what they are wanting to buy like FSDT recently did? Those two airports you mention above, Quebec(CYQB) Graz, Austria(LOWG), frankly I have never seen anyone on any flight sim forum ask for. Is that to say they wont sell well? Not necessarly, but when you have people in droves asking for other stuff, why not give them what they want?
Anyway, these are just my opinions and being in business for myself I understand that its nice to work on projects that interest yourself, but its another to deliever stuff that people are actually asking for, especially when your are wanting to make a living doing so.
Regards