Hey Ed,edetroit wrote:I remember very well when you used to curse FSX ...george[flytampa] wrote:
Oh FS9ers, sigh.
I remember too. It was an abomination upon release , but a 5 computer upgrades later, it runs pretty well.
Hey Ed,edetroit wrote:I remember very well when you used to curse FSX ...george[flytampa] wrote:
Oh FS9ers, sigh.
5 comp upgrades!...I'm still running the same one....maybe that explains a lot. LOLgeorge[flytampa] wrote: Hey Ed,
I remember too. It was an abomination upon release , but a 5 computer upgrades later, it runs pretty well.
We don't need any hope, mate. It is flourishing and addons are being developed all the time, thank you.aceridgey wrote:desperately trying to cling on to the hope that FS9 will flourish and develop
I have no doubts everybody is.tors wrote:We should be grateful
I'm not sure why that would even be needed and I don't think it was needed in the past as we always make the FS9 conversions last, usually days before release.Querer wrote:I just learned from O. Pabst at Aerosoft, that you did send him only the FSX-Version for AES support. Is this true? If yes, why? If you announce the scenery to be released simultaneously for FSX, FS9 and P3D, why you do not provide O. Pabst the necessary files for him to provide AES support as well for FS9? Don't understand this...
Martin, thank you and FlyTampa very much for your efforts. I'm only asking as a clarification - whether or not AES Support is available for FS9 truly is irrelevant for me (I use FS9, for the record). Does this mean that AES Support for FS9 will be available?martin[flytampa] wrote:I'm not sure why that would even be needed and I don't think it was needed in the past as we always make the FS9 conversions last, usually days before release.Querer wrote:I just learned from O. Pabst at Aerosoft, that you did send him only the FSX-Version for AES support. Is this true? If yes, why? If you announce the scenery to be released simultaneously for FSX, FS9 and P3D, why you do not provide O. Pabst the necessary files for him to provide AES support as well for FS9? Don't understand this...
As far as I'm aware AES support will be avail for FS9. I know Oliver mentioned that he would be off for a week starting today or tomorrow, maybe he will release after he comes back.arabianva wrote:Martin, thank you and FlyTampa very much for your efforts. I'm only asking as a clarification - whether or not AES Support is available for FS9 truly is irrelevant for me (I use FS9, for the record). Does this mean that AES Support for FS9 will be available?Again I am simply asking for clarification - if it's not it's not big deal to me. The scenery itself is more than enough.
Keep up the amazing work! You have my VA's and VATSIM Community's appreciation and gratitude for this wonderful addon.
Hi Martin,martin[flytampa] wrote:As far as I'm aware AES support will be avail for FS9. I know Oliver mentioned that he would be off for a week starting today or tomorrow, maybe he will release after he comes back.
Yes I'm curious about that to. I use GSX aswell and would love to see moving jetways without having to purchase AES.aceridgey wrote:777 will be amazing for here!!
Cannot believe it, I will be purchasing the moment the triple 7 comes out..
Hopefully won't be too hard on the fps!
EDIT!
Will this be compatible with FSDT GSX?? [Moving Jetways?]
Alex
Done, new shot attached, also with slightly greener glass.mozart wrote: Maybe just fix those stand designators (my comment number 1 above).
Your other suggestions I would love to do, the problem is there will always be a little left to perfection in all kinds of areas you haven't yet seen up close. Because the coverage is about 4 times that of Hong Kong there is unfortunately no chance I can build customized high-es perfection everywhere. There are limitations on the amount of texture sheet, general performance worries, development-time limitations etc etc. The city overall is similar to Hong Kong in terms of quality and resolution. In other words, can't drive a car down Sheikh Zayed Road and see street signs.mozart wrote:why not add the one little extra perfection. Thus: