Next Airport?

Post Reply
deltalpha
Posts: 78

Re: Next Airport?

Post by deltalpha » Tue Feb 01, 2011 4:20 pm

MidgeyMidget2 wrote:
deltalpha wrote:KSLC has never, in any sim, been done before...
Wrong. Check AVSIM or Flightsim.com.
Well, to be fair, isn't KSAN on AVSIM or Flightsim.com too?
socal000
Posts: 23

Re: Next Airport?

Post by socal000 » Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:32 pm

deltalpha wrote:
MidgeyMidget2 wrote:
deltalpha wrote:KSLC has never, in any sim, been done before...
Wrong. Check AVSIM or Flightsim.com.
Well, to be fair, isn't KSAN on AVSIM or Flightsim.com too?
Did you check? No it's not
Pontiac151 wrote:
You know why? It has never been done by a PAYWARE company. All there is that crap Gary Widup scenery that is terrible.

All of you voting for San Diego, there is no need, there is nothing wrong with it and nothing new =D. Explain why SAN is so freakin' amazing that it needs to be done right this second?
1. Good comeback, way to be original. :wink:

2. Before you call the Gary Widup scenery "crap", I'd like to see you make an amazing scenery. A lot harder than you think.

3. Clearly you are not reading my posts, or you just have comprehension problems. I am very clearly and obviously stating, *ahem*
RENOVATIONS ARE BEING DONE TO TERMINAL 2, ADDING 10 MORE GATES AND A MULTI-LEVEL ROADWAY! So yes, it will be something new.

I will seriously be amazed if you are enough of a child to continue arguing about this with no facts or background information. Be happy they're making scenery at all. A new KSAN is purely a suggestion. Yours is basically saying "SLc is teh cooolest airport in teh world n ur idiots if u dnt do it!!1!...alsO anybdy who doesnt want it is an idoit!!!1!1!!"

You're giving no fact or background information, or any legitimate reason why KSLC should be done


And I forget who posted it, but thank you for the Cielosim link. I go nothing against them, but honestly it doesn't look much different from the current flytampa KSAN, they're not showing us enough yet, and it doesn't look like they're including the renovations.
skydvdan
Posts: 2121

Re: Next Airport?

Post by skydvdan » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:33 pm

Pontiac151 wrote:All there is that crap Gary Widup scenery that is terrible.
Clearly you have no idea what goes into designing one of these sceneries. Until you do I suggest you shut it "tough guy".
Pontiac151
Posts: 39

Re: Next Airport?

Post by Pontiac151 » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:25 pm

skydvdan wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:All there is that crap Gary Widup scenery that is terrible.
Clearly you have no idea what goes into designing one of these sceneries. Until you do I suggest you shut it "tough guy".

Hah, another punk.
Pontiac151
Posts: 39

Re: Next Airport?

Post by Pontiac151 » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:25 pm

deltalpha wrote:
MidgeyMidget2 wrote:
deltalpha wrote:KSLC has never, in any sim, been done before...
Wrong. Check AVSIM or Flightsim.com.
Well, to be fair, isn't KSAN on AVSIM or Flightsim.com too?

+1
MidgeyMidget2
Posts: 1235

Re: Next Airport?

Post by MidgeyMidget2 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:38 am

Pontiac151 wrote:
skydvdan wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:All there is that crap Gary Widup scenery that is terrible.
Clearly you have no idea what goes into designing one of these sceneries. Until you do I suggest you shut it "tough guy".

Hah, another punk.
Image
skydvdan
Posts: 2121

Re: Next Airport?

Post by skydvdan » Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:40 am

Pontiac151 wrote:
skydvdan wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:All there is that crap Gary Widup scenery that is terrible.
Clearly you have no idea what goes into designing one of these sceneries. Until you do I suggest you shut it "tough guy".

Hah, another punk.
That's funny coming from the guy that's crying about not getting the airport done in the city that he lives in that no one else is really interested in. How about you go back out to the playground and just let the grown ups talk little man. Clearly you're new around here numpty.
socal000
Posts: 23

Re: Next Airport?

Post by socal000 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:45 am

Pontiac151 wrote:+1

Gotta love these 12 y/o's that read only what they want to read, and don't give up until the scenery they want is done.

If you had the intelligence to check before agreeing, Pontiac, you will see there is no KSAN at all on Avsim, yet there is KSLC.

deltalpha - Thank you for the suggestion, but no KSAN is not on Avsim or Flightsim.

The numerous fails in this argument are actually starting to make this hilarious.
tri tri
Posts: 3

Re: Next Airport?

Post by tri tri » Wed Feb 02, 2011 11:14 am

how about kewr yes i know about the imaginesim one but the night textures are horrible and the fps are even more horrible
socal000
Posts: 23

Re: Next Airport?

Post by socal000 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:33 pm

tri tri wrote:how about kewr yes i know about the imaginesim one but the night textures are horrible and the fps are even more horrible
I'm a fan of KEWR, it's actually my home airport, but there is one an avsim that isn't too bad, and the imaginesim one, you might be able to change the FS9 scenery setting to get better FPS.

The only reason I'd say no is because it has been done before, I think one of the things that flytampa considers when they're looking at airports is if it's been done before, especially by a payware company.
Pontiac151
Posts: 39

Re: Next Airport?

Post by Pontiac151 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 5:08 pm

socal000 wrote:
tri tri wrote:how about kewr yes i know about the imaginesim one but the night textures are horrible and the fps are even more horrible
I'm a fan of KEWR, it's actually my home airport, but there is one an avsim that isn't too bad, and the imaginesim one, you might be able to change the FS9 scenery setting to get better FPS.

The only reason I'd say no is because it has been done before, I think one of the things that flytampa considers when they're looking at airports is if it's been done before, especially by a payware company.

I mentioned EWR before. Another one that needs to be badly too, as I stated, it is probably 1 of the 2 worst sceneries ImagineSim did, DTW being #1, EWR #2.
Pontiac151
Posts: 39

Re: Next Airport?

Post by Pontiac151 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 5:10 pm

socal000 wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:+1

Gotta love these 12 y/o's that read only what they want to read, and don't give up until the scenery they want is done.

If you had the intelligence to check before agreeing, Pontiac, you will see there is no KSAN at all on Avsim, yet there is KSLC.

deltalpha - Thank you for the suggestion, but no KSAN is not on Avsim or Flightsim.

The numerous fails in this argument are actually starting to make this hilarious.

That's funny, I'm not even close to 12. LOL FAIL
socal000
Posts: 23

Re: Next Airport?

Post by socal000 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:00 pm

Pontiac151 wrote:
socal000 wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:+1

Gotta love these 12 y/o's that read only what they want to read, and don't give up until the scenery they want is done.

If you had the intelligence to check before agreeing, Pontiac, you will see there is no KSAN at all on Avsim, yet there is KSLC.

deltalpha - Thank you for the suggestion, but no KSAN is not on Avsim or Flightsim.

The numerous fails in this argument are actually starting to make this hilarious.

That's funny, I'm not even close to 12. LOL FAIL
Sorry, here is my corrected sentence:
Gotta love these 8 y/o's that read only what they want to read, and don't give up until the scenery they want is done.
MidgeyMidget2
Posts: 1235

Re: Next Airport?

Post by MidgeyMidget2 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:23 pm

Pontiac151 wrote:I mentioned EWR before. Another one that needs to be badly too, as I stated, it is probably 1 of the 2 worst sceneries ImagineSim did, DTW being #1, EWR #2.
Are you really that dumb? DTW and EWR are some of the oldest airports from ImagineSim. Of course they aren't going to be that good compared to today's standards.
Post Reply