Next Airport?

trevorpilot1234 · Post by **trevorpilot1234** » Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:12 pm

MidgeyMidget2 wrote:
trevorpilot1234 wrote:Oregon!!! Denver!!!
Jamaica!?!?!?!?!?

What about Jamaica?

MidgeyMidget2 · Post by **MidgeyMidget2** » Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:54 pm

trevorpilot1234 wrote: What about Jamaica?

Who said anything about Jamaica?

Etienne22 · Post by **Etienne22** » Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:03 pm

Pontiac151 wrote:Denver= No.

Salt Lake City Int'l? SLC has a terrible free-ware and is not accurate, that is the one that lacks the most attention besides STL, DTW, etc.

SLC is my vote, I think this one should be seriously considered!

SLC +1

deltaboeing84 · Post by **deltaboeing84** » Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:23 pm

I'm trying to figure out how to do photoreal scenery. Anyone have any idea what kind of tools or programs that I would need? I did a google search, but it didn't help that much.

FSXflyer12 · Post by **FSXflyer12** » Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:33 pm

CYEG and CYXD or all the Edmonton Airports would be cool but CYEG and CYXD are main airports in Edmonton anyone in Edmonton (like me) would like that its not major or small Except CYXD Thanks

Brandon Danyluk

Pontiac151 · Post by **Pontiac151** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:54 am

trevorpilot1234 wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:Denver= No.

Salt Lake City Int'l? SLC has a terrible free-ware and is not accurate, that is the one that lacks the most attention besides STL, DTW, etc.

SLC is my vote, I think this one should be seriously considered!
Why SLC? What's wrong with denver?

Denver has already been done by Imaginesim, and that is one of their best airports too. EWR needs to be done badly too, Imaginesim EWR straight out stinks. My votes are EWR or SLC. I said why SLC needs to be re-done, go back and read

ckaack · Post by **ckaack** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 4:23 am

Pontiac151 wrote:Denver has already been done by Imaginesim

but for FS 2002 and 2004 only. FSX is missing!

Pontiac151 wrote:EWR needs to be done badly too

As long as FSDT follows the last voiting, they will do KEWR after KLAX

trevorpilot1234 · Post by **trevorpilot1234** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:18 am

Pontiac151 wrote:
trevorpilot1234 wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:Denver= No.

Salt Lake City Int'l? SLC has a terrible free-ware and is not accurate, that is the one that lacks the most attention besides STL, DTW, etc.

SLC is my vote, I think this one should be seriously considered!
Why SLC? What's wrong with denver?

Denver has already been done by Imaginesim, and that is one of their best airports too. EWR needs to be done badly too, Imaginesim EWR straight out stinks. My votes are EWR or SLC. I said why SLC needs to be re-done, go back and read

What about a scenery for FSX?

Pontiac151 · Post by **Pontiac151** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:49 pm

FSX is terrible, and has never been reliable like FS9 has. Alot more problems with it also. That's why a FSX scenery was never made, or the company thought they would not profit from a FSX DEN Scenery by Imaginesim

Pontiac151 · Post by **Pontiac151** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:52 pm

ckaack wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:Denver has already been done by Imaginesim
but for FS 2002 and 2004 only. FSX is missing!

Pontiac151 wrote:EWR needs to be done badly too
As long as FSDT follows the last voiting, they will do KEWR after KLAX

Thank god, EWR needs it BAD. Imaginesim EWR is 1 of the 2 worst sceneries they made, number 1 being DTW, then EWR. Sounds like CO/UA will sort of downgrade the EWR hub, I heared IAH will be the largest UA hub.

MidgeyMidget2 · Post by **MidgeyMidget2** » Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:56 pm

Pontiac151 wrote:
ckaack wrote:
Pontiac151 wrote:Denver has already been done by Imaginesim
but for FS 2002 and 2004 only. FSX is missing!

Pontiac151 wrote:EWR needs to be done badly too
As long as FSDT follows the last voiting, they will do KEWR after KLAX

Thank god, EWR needs it BAD. Imaginesim EWR is 1 of the 2 worst sceneries they made, number 1 being DTW, then EWR. Sounds like CO/UA will sort of downgrade the EWR hub, I heared IAH will be the largest UA hub.

I wouldn't count on EWR being made right after LAX is released by FSDT. FSDT, IIRC, hinted that KMIA would probably be the next scenery (and I believe it would be made by their other team...not the one doing LAX).

Pontiac151 · Post by **Pontiac151** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:35 am

I know that EWR will be made, big hub and major NY Airport= Major US Airport. BluePrint is finishing up LAX and it should be released within a week or less. I know for sure EWR will be made, I just hope by FT!

ckaack · Post by **ckaack** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 4:46 am

Pontiac151 wrote:FSX is terrible, and has never been reliable like FS9 has. Alot more problems with it also. That's why a FSX scenery was never made, or the company thought they would not profit from a FSX DEN Scenery by Imaginesim

I am using FSX and will never return to FS9. A lot of people tried FSX on a FS9 machine and for sure failed, because system requirements are much higher. The stability and graphics of FSX are much better.

ckaack · Post by **ckaack** » Sun Jan 23, 2011 4:48 am

Pontiac151 wrote:I heared IAH will be the largest UA hub.

IAH is already the largest hub of Continental and will continue together with SFO and ORD.

Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?

Re: Next Airport?