Future scenerys and possible scenery updates for fsx

Post by **martin[flytampa]** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:40 am

skydvdan wrote:That's why we only need TNCM for FS9.

Someone else tells me that everyday

I am using TNCM/Barts as playground to test how things can be done in FSX - and that takes time. If it turns out crap or the FS9 version receives more interest then the FSX version in the long run, that will certainly have consequences for whatever scenery I develop after that, if any.

plevys · Post by **plevys** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:20 pm

I would be curious to know what Imaginesim's sales have been like the past two days for CVG as it was released for FS9 only. Same with Gary Summons EGSS scenery for FS9. By the way, I purchased both for use in FS9 as I intend to stay with FS9 probably until FS11 as FSX just looks to be too buggy and not worth the hassle as I have way too many addons for FS9.
I will say that anything FT puts out for FS9, I will buy. If they make it FSX only...no money from me. I wish Cloud 9 made MCO for FS9...I bet their sales of FSX only products have been very sluggish.

Good point. I am still buying FS9 only products because I will be using this sim along with FSX for a long time to come.

Imaginesim however clearly states on the CVG product information page that an FSX update is right around the corner and will be free to FS9 owners. I just hope they do this with their other sceneries. I am a huge FlyTampa fan as well as Imaginesim and Cloud9.

BodoM · Post by **BodoM** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:14 pm

martin[flytampa] wrote:
Someone else tells me that everyday

I am using TNCM/Barts as playground to test how things can be done in FSX - and that takes time. If it turns out crap or the FS9 version receives more interest then the FSX version in the long run, that will certainly have consequences for whatever scenery I develop after that, if any.

Well, me too

I would appreciate if you could work on the FS9 version full steam to get it out asap

Then you could take your time for the FSX version in quiet

N141AP · Post by **N141AP** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:30 pm

I for sure support anything that comes out for FS9 and will continue to for quite a long time. I'm one of those people who have a good computer but by chance FSX runs like crap on it, go figure...

Now I just need to find a developer that would like to continue KSTL, haha. ImagineSim told me they "might" consider restarting and OSS died. *sighs*

Dimon · Post by **Dimon** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:50 pm

Guys,

Don't forget that even if ACES will find a solution for both overall performance and SDK Scenery issues, all FSX scenery products (future and current ones) will be useless without a program that is similar to AFCAD in FS9. It might takes months, if not years.

Dimon · Post by **Dimon** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:52 pm

B777ER wrote:
martin[flytampa] wrote: I would be curious to know what Imaginesim's sales have been like the past two days for CVG as it was released for FS9 only. .

I bought it yesterday. Still not a FlyTampa's quality, but they're getting better and better with each release.

plevys · Post by **plevys** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:56 pm

Hey FlyTampa guys whatever happened to LGA? I will buy it even if it's only for FS9.

skydvdan · Post by **skydvdan** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:21 pm

martin[flytampa] wrote:
skydvdan wrote:That's why we only need TNCM for FS9.
Someone else tells me that everyday

I figured. What to do, what to do... only time will tell.

martin[flytampa] wrote:...if any.

Let's not get crazy now.

skydvdan · Post by **skydvdan** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:24 pm

plevys wrote:Hey FlyTampa guys whatever happened to LGA? I will buy it even if it's only for FS9.

The search function will work wonders... LGA.

Post by **martin[flytampa]** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:28 pm

Dimon wrote:without a program that is similar to AFCAD in FS9

You don't need that, try XML code in notepad and BGLComp.exe, way more exciting and "geeky". Seriously, while I am sure there will be some sort or several "airport-facility-editor" GUIs, I doubt we will see anything as polished as Lee's Afcad GUI. That was an absolute gem in the world of FS tools.... the best in fact.. closely followed by the FS8/9 Autogen editor which caused several broken fingers and weeks of spastic syntoms. Some devs had to charge extra for the autogen to pay their hospital bills.

flysiu · Post by **flysiu** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:24 pm

N141AP wrote:I for sure support anything that comes out for FS9 and will continue to for quite a long time. I'm one of those people who have a good computer but by chance FSX runs like crap on it, go figure...

Now I just need to find a developer that would like to continue KSTL, haha. ImagineSim told me they "might" consider restarting and OSS died. *sighs*

You said it! STL definately needs some love, especially with the new runway that spans the perimeter road(s). I fly into STL every month connecting to Chicago and would LOVE to see someone finally give the gateway to the west some attention.

skydvdan · Post by **skydvdan** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:47 pm

Personally if I there's an airport that I'd like to see that I think has definitely been overlooked I would have to go with KPIT. That's one that I'd like to see a developer do.

KPryor · Post by **KPryor** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:49 pm

flysiu wrote: You said it! STL definately needs some love, especially with the new runway that spans the perimeter road(s). I fly into STL every month connecting to Chicago and would LOVE to see someone finally give the gateway to the west some attention.

Just being nosy, but I see your username is flysiu, so I figured you're in Carbondale. Do you fly out of Marion to STL and then on to Chicago?
KP

Post by **martin[flytampa]** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:11 pm

skydvdan wrote:Personally if I there's an airport that I'd like to see that I think has definitely been overlooked I would have to go with KPIT. That's one that I'd like to see a developer do.

Dan requesting airports!!! The end of the universe must be near