Toronto MSFS V1.4 / 1.3 released

[martin[flytampa]]

Please run the test again:

download same link (modified file):
https://www.flytampa.org/dwl/flytampa_t ... odelLib.7z

extract and overwrite the file in:
/community/flytampa-toronto/scenery/global/

See if the double lines are gone everywhere around the airport. Also things like "static aircraft" from the aerial imagery should be gone.

[Barnes]

Please run the test again:

download same link (modified file):
https://www.flytampa.org/dwl/flytampa_t ... odelLib.7z

extract and overwrite the file in:
/community/flytampa-toronto/scenery/global/

See if the double lines are gone everywhere around the airport. Also things like "static aircraft" from the aerial imagery should be gone.

Thanks Martin - It's Fixed!!
Thanks for looking into this and taking care of it so quickly.
Out of curiosity, why would this appear as a problem for some and not others?

[martin[flytampa]]

Out of curiosity, why would this appear as a problem for some and not others?

I have absolutely no idea why :)
I will do a new full compile for you to test soon.

[martin[flytampa]]

Please reinstall version 1.3 using the Universal Installer (must download from Dreamhost US server, default selection).
See if everything with the ground, taxilight triangles, missing terminals etc is running well in 2024. Thanks

[Barnes]

Please reinstall version 1.3 using the Universal Installer (must download from Dreamhost US server, default selection).
See if everything with the ground, taxilight triangles, missing terminals etc is running well in 2024. Thanks

I can confirm that v1.3, installed from scratch using the FT Universal Installer (Dreamhost server), is working properly for me in MSFS2024.

Thanks Again.

Dave

[akhouzam]

For those of us who purchased through ORBX, will the file be available also?

Thanks for your help!

[MrSauga]

All good now. I love this scenery. Thanks Martin.

[akhouzam]

Thank you for doing this as quickly as you did. I tested the new compile and it does look beautiful in both 2024 and 2020. I have attached a video below.

https://youtube.com/live/rVBl3Kvmi0Y

I'm sure this is unrelated, but I was also looking for static satellite aircraft and stumbled across a farm just west of rwy 15R. I'm sure that is outside of FlyTampa scenery and part of the default scenery, but I thought I would let you know just in case (at ~4:20 in video).

[micahelcarson27]

Hi, i just installed version 1.4 and now all of my ground markings in the apron are gone. I see taxi lines but there are not any triangles with the gate numbers or the stop bars at any gates. its simply just yellow lines. any help would be appreciated
Thanks.

[martin[flytampa]]

Please install version 1.4 again. The triangle marking slipped the last build when fixing the ground issues some users were having. Its fixed now.

[seeingeyegod]

Looking for some help or at least moral support with FT Toronto in 2024. It looks fine, but performance is HORRIBLE. I am running a 5800X3d, 32Gb, 4070Ti Super. I run 4k and mostly ultra and get decent performance most of the time. Even at addon airports, like for instance RomanDesign CYOW runs perfectly fine, CYYZ however is just, terrible terrible terrible. If nothing is moving performance is okay, but if I either look around or start trying to take off, I get literally ONE frame per second. As soon as I'm 100ft off the ground it starts steadily getting better of course, and soon my performance is back to normal. Is it just Toronto the city or is it the airport? Is anyone else experiencing this?

[seeingeyegod]

How is this forum so dead?!?

[george[flytampa]]

1 fps isn't normal. You might have a duplicate scenery install, too many complex AI flightplans, ATC software, or settings too high.

We can only guess as its your setup. It runs at 50-60fps here on a 5950X and 4090.
Strip it down to the stock scenery and see if you have problems.

[micahelcarson27]

is there any plan to add more snow cover to the taxiways and runways, flying in after a snowstorm and having no snow on the runways is a bit of a bummer. Totally understandable if its not possible due to limitations but it would be cool to have for winter months for sure