KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

micstatic
Posts: 39

Re: KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

Post by micstatic » Tue Jun 01, 2021 9:34 am

gotta be honest. this is really disappointing.
erict
Posts: 15

Re: KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

Post by erict » Tue Jun 01, 2021 9:55 pm

There's your answer. Happy now?
pauly123
Posts: 74

Re: KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

Post by pauly123 » Mon Jun 07, 2021 6:41 pm

No need to wait for KATL-- I got ImaginesimKATL and love it
corey777
Posts: 5

Re: KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

Post by corey777 » Sun Jun 13, 2021 5:29 am

emilios[flytampa] wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 11:31 am KATL was removed from the map because it doesn't fit anymore into our development plans. Odd, I know, and the only time an announced FT airport is being cancelled, but after a long cycle of stopping and restarting, we decided to kill it for several reasons. If conditions allow, we might restart it a later point.
It is disappointing to see that KATL has been cancelled. I had always hoped that FT or FB would develop it and was ecstatic when FT put the yellow dot on the map and announced it. I hope future conditions will allow you to restart it at a later time. Your airports are works of art in my eyes and I can't wait to see what FT will do in the future once the airports mentioned in George's post in the other KATL thread are brought over to MSFS.

Keep up the good work and best regards,

Corey
kmanning
Posts: 17

Re: KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

Post by kmanning » Sun Dec 12, 2021 11:35 pm

This is exactly what I was griping about when this airport was announced to the public and went 3 years or more not getting released. This airport should have NEVER been announced, getting everybody all excited about this airport that has a very high demand, and all of sudden it's dropped because it doesn't fit into their development plans. That not good enough! There is no reason for it not to fit into their plans with such high demands for this airport. If the demand is there, and there is a very HIGH demand for this airport, there is no reason not to develop the KATL airport. There is NO excuse for this kind of service, starting on something that everybody wants, posting it for everyone to read and getting their hopes all excited, and suddenly it's dropped in the trash! I know there's another version put out by Imagine sim, but it has too many damn problems with the frame rate. I am very pisses off about this and we all deserve to have a good KATL scenery airport that is stable and does not bog down the frame rate, making everything jerky and you're seeing the scenery move frame by frame instead of a smooth continuous motion without any jerkyness. That's what I don't like about imagine sim.
pauly123
Posts: 74

Re: KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

Post by pauly123 » Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:18 pm

Sorry, but your expectation is too high. FlyTampa is one or two kids working our of their mommy's basement. You need to allow time so they can actually date a girl every now and then. I doubt you'll see anymore P3D scenery from them.
kmanning
Posts: 17

Re: KATL - Hartsfield Airport Progress for P3v5

Post by kmanning » Tue Dec 14, 2021 11:36 pm

pauly123 wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:18 pm Sorry, but your expectation is too high. FlyTampa is one or two kids working our of their mommy's basement. You need to allow time so they can actually date a girl every now and then. I doubt you'll see anymore P3D scenery from them.

No, my expectations are not too high. In the first place, why is FlyTampa using only 2 kids to make their sceneries? Kids do not make professional sceneries. There should only be those that are professionals at making and designing sceneries, and they need to be fully staffed, not just two. What in the world is someone as big as FlyTampa not having more than 2 when they should have a full staff? I know FSDT are not making sceneries for P3Dv4 or 5 anymore and I was very pissed off and complained about it. I don't care who the scenery designers are, there is NO excuse for this kind of crappy service just because MSFS2020 is the new sim of the future. They are NOT all that great and they are no more the sim of the future than the LM P3Dv4! The LM P3Dv4 are NOT old and out of date and there are more people using the P3Dv4 and 5 than the MSFS2020. It is not right for scenery designers to stop making sceneries for P3Dv4 and make them only for MSFS2020, as though there are not enough LM P3D users out there. I'm already pissed off about FSDT not making sceneries for the P3Ds, and if everybody stops making sceneries for the LM P3Dv4 and 5, there's going to be a lot more people pissed off. It is NOT being fair to those who run LM P3Ds. This is nothing more than to have everybody to buy a new sim every few years and then have to buy aircraft addons and sceneries addons for the new sim, and to keep everyone in their wallet. Saying "Sorry" doesn't cut it! It's doing their due diligence that counts, where that EVERYONE benefits, NOT just certain ones that they want to serve! The LM P3D users have been buying products from all these companies for years and this is the way they're treated!
Post Reply