Montreal Screenshots

[qqwertz]

Just installed and tried CYUL. Beautiful but fairly slow on my system. However, my main concern is something else:
do I correctly understand that the jetways are not movable?

[george[flytampa]]

Just installed and tried CYUL. Beautiful but fairly slow on my system. However, my main concern is something else:
do I correctly understand that the jetways are not movable?

Animated jets arnt provided as standard, in fact they cause even more slow down via stuttering in our tests. but, AES may provide support for moving jets in the very near future.

You can tweak the scenery via the installer options to gain more performance .Performance varies depending on the speed of your system. Try removing 3&D grass, static vehicles or using 1024 textures.
hope that helps. I know it's not the answer you wanted but we try so hard to satisfy so many various needs.
I'll check on the ETA of Aerosoft's AES for you soon.

[BoazDK]

Amazing job! Simply stunning quality!

You guys are still the best in the biz! And yes please do more Canadian airports!

[balami1]

This is now one of my new favorite airports on FS9. I don't think I've ever loved a women as much as I love Flytampa Montreal!!! WOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! MOOONNNTTTRRREEEEAAAAAALLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks,


Brandon

[george[flytampa]]

You might have some problems But thanks .

[balami1]

I only had problems until Montreal was released. Montreal fixed me.

[kui5566]

Hi George,

again this is the best airport u ever made

can i ask when is the AES available?

thanks

[george[flytampa]]

can i ask when is the AES available?

thanks

Thank you.

AES will be available next weekend or around the end of this month.

[qqwertz]

I am not a big fan of AES because I own GSX, which would do the same job if the jetways would move. I don't own any other airport where AES would be of use, so buying AES would effectively raise the price for CYUL by 50% for me.
CYUL is the first payware airport (of quite a few) that I own where the jetways cannot be moved out of the box

Something else: I experienced a technical problem with CYUL on the approach to rwy 24R. Several strange yellow-green textures hovered over the airport, which look a bit like a sonar picture. They stayed there for almost the entire approach. Does anybody else have this problem?

[george[flytampa]]

I am not a big fan of AES because I own GSX, which would do the same job if the jetways would move. I don't own any other airport where AES would be of use, so buying AES would effectively raise the price for CYUL by 50% for me.
CYUL is the first payware airport (of quite a few) that I own where the jetways cannot be moved out of the box

Something else: I experienced a technical problem with CYUL on the approach to rwy 24R. Several strange yellow-green textures hovered over the airport, which look a bit like a sonar picture. They stayed there for almost the entire approach. Does anybody else have this problem?

We are supporting AES because they provide support for custom jetways. GSX doesn't.
Animated jetways can cause some slowdown & stuttering. Plus the IK animations in FSX are disappointing in quality. (jerky & not precise)

The Sonar effect can be removed by re-installing & un-ticking the 3d Mist. For some reason, it doesn't render well on all Videocards.

[barbecan]

Great airport..best yet

[Joe D]

Great Scenery!!!!! Thanks for making an FS9 version. Frame rates work great and the graphics are nice and crisp.

[Mike...]

Great Scenery!!!!! Thanks for making an FS9 version. Frame rates work great and the graphics are nice and crisp.

+1

Nice job indeed, thanks guys!

[Flukey]

Great Scenery!!!!! Thanks for making an FS9 version. Frame rates work great and the graphics are nice and crisp.

+1

Nice job indeed, thanks guys!

+1 on continuing to provide us FS9 users with fantastic airports....

Man I fear not telling the wife how much money I have injected into getting all these developed airports, she's already on my case for how much time I spend "playing" with it.......