-
Pontiac151
- Posts: 39
Post
by Pontiac151 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:29 pm
ckaack wrote:Pontiac151 wrote:I heared IAH will be the largest UA hub.
IAH is already the largest hub of Continental and will continue together with SFO and ORD.
Does that mean EWR and IAD will be downgraded a bit?
-
dcflyer
- Posts: 41
Post
by dcflyer » Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:15 pm
What about a IAD airport? Living near DC, I use this airport all of the time. I have been really dissapointed with the attempts made so far at dulles by other scenery companies. Can you please consider this airport. This is one of the classic airports in America, not to mention that it serves the nation's capital. I strongly believe that it deserves the attention of a premier flight simulater scenery company such as flytampa.
-
Etienne22
- Posts: 151
Post
by Etienne22 » Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:56 pm
dcflyer wrote:What about a IAD airport? Living near DC, I use this airport all of the time. I have been really dissapointed with the attempts made so far at dulles by other scenery companies. Can you please consider this airport. This is one of the classic airports in America, not to mention that it serves the nation's capital. I strongly believe that it deserves the attention of a premier flight simulater scenery company such as flytampa.
theres a good scenery of IAD by imaginesim
-
dcflyer
- Posts: 41
Post
by dcflyer » Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:06 pm
I have already tried that download, however it always glitches up on me. I also don't like the fact that the airport comes with static traffic. This completely disables me from using any other AI traffic programs.
-
Pontiac151
- Posts: 39
Post
by Pontiac151 » Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:45 pm
dcflyer wrote:What about a IAD airport? Living near DC, I use this airport all of the time. I have been really dissapointed with the attempts made so far at dulles by other scenery companies. Can you please consider this airport. This is one of the classic airports in America, not to mention that it serves the nation's capital. I strongly believe that it deserves the attention of a premier flight simulater scenery company such as flytampa.
I would consider BWI more than IAD. IAD has been made by 2 companies, those being BluePrint and Imaginesim, and both are absolutely fine and very realistic, there is no reason to do a 3rd Dulles when nothing has changed. BWI would get priority, or DCA even too.
-
dcflyer
- Posts: 41
Post
by dcflyer » Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:08 pm
I have already tried both scenery updates. The main problem with both of them is that they are older add-ons, and I am always having trouble with both of them. I experience many glitches and my new computer just does not seem to work with them. There have also been many changes made to Dulles since the last imaginesim scenery. A new runway has been added and the shuttle system featured in blueprint and imaginesim is being replaced by an underground train system. A new terminal is also in the making. However, I do agree that DCA should be looked at as well
Last edited by
dcflyer on Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
skydvdan
- Posts: 2121
Post
by skydvdan » Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:55 pm
dcflyer wrote:I have already tried that download, however it always glitches up on me. I also don't like the fact that the airport comes with static traffic. This completely disables me from using any other AI traffic programs.
You can remove the static traffic.
-
socal000
- Posts: 23
Post
by socal000 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:39 pm
I think a "Rebooted" San Diego would be cool. The Rebooted Tampa looks really nice, and as some of you may know, KSAN has recently begun work on adding 10 new gates, and a multi-level roadway in front of Terminal 2. It would be cool to see that done, and perhaps have it FSX compatible since many users complain that it doesn't work in FSX.
-
dcflyer
- Posts: 41
Post
by dcflyer » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:16 am
skydvdan wrote:dcflyer wrote:I have already tried that download, however it always glitches up on me. I also don't like the fact that the airport comes with static traffic. This completely disables me from using any other AI traffic programs.
You can remove the static traffic.
The problem with removing the static traffic is that it once the static traffic is removed, any AI traffic program you try to put on turns invisible at the airport. I don't know if this is just for Imaginesim Dulles, or for all static traffic airports.
-
skydvdan
- Posts: 2121
Post
by skydvdan » Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:31 pm
dcflyer wrote:skydvdan wrote:dcflyer wrote:I have already tried that download, however it always glitches up on me. I also don't like the fact that the airport comes with static traffic. This completely disables me from using any other AI traffic programs.
You can remove the static traffic.
The problem with removing the static traffic is that it once the static traffic is removed, any AI traffic program you try to put on turns invisible at the airport. I don't know if this is just for Imaginesim Dulles, or for all static traffic airports.
I never had that issue.
-
Mike...
- Posts: 147
Post
by Mike... » Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:28 am
There have also been many changes made to Dulles since the last imaginesim scenery. A new runway has been added
The new runway 1L/19R? It's in Imagine's payware scenery...
As for AI traffic (not specifically developped for FSX) not appearing, isn't that well known FSX problem? Can't see how disabling a static aircraft bgl, could have an effect like that.
-
psykie
- Posts: 75
Post
by psykie » Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:39 pm
I agree SoCal. A Rebooted KSAN for FSX with updated terminal buildings would be Great. Cielosim is working on a FS9 KSAN and promised to make a FSX KSAN but they never post anything on their forum and quite frankly I don't think they are moving on it. So, FlyTampa, please considor a Rebooted KSAN!
Matthew
-
Pontiac151
- Posts: 39
Post
by Pontiac151 » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:44 am
psykie wrote:I agree SoCal. A Rebooted KSAN for FSX with updated terminal buildings would be Great. Cielosim is working on a FS9 KSAN and promised to make a FSX KSAN but they never post anything on their forum and quite frankly I don't think they are moving on it. So, FlyTampa, please considor a Rebooted KSAN!
Matthew
What's the point in making a scenery over again that has not changed at all? SLC should get seniority.... totally.
-
MidgeyMidget2
- Posts: 1235
Post
by MidgeyMidget2 » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:30 am
Pontiac151 wrote:psykie wrote:I agree SoCal. A Rebooted KSAN for FSX with updated terminal buildings would be Great. Cielosim is working on a FS9 KSAN and promised to make a FSX KSAN but they never post anything on their forum and quite frankly I don't think they are moving on it. So, FlyTampa, please considor a Rebooted KSAN!
Matthew
What's the point in making a scenery over again that has not changed at all? SLC should get seniority.... totally.
What's the point in arguing when you are accomplishing absolutely nothing...totally.