Both feet are bleeding and the next post will be a headshotbkircher wrote:shooting yourself in the foot

Both feet are bleeding and the next post will be a headshotbkircher wrote:shooting yourself in the foot
bkircher wrote:George, not to be rude, but you are kind of digging your own grave here or shooting yourself in the foot. You say that sales are not as good as compared to sales in the past, and I agree piracy is a bigggggg issue here. But when you ask for requests about the next airport, I totally understand where you are coming from with wanting to make an intersting airport, but do you really think there is a big market for the last few places that you have released?? Buf and the greidiens(or how ever you spell it). THose are regional airports, granted yes they are interesting thats for sure, but not a major demand in the market. If you look throughout this topic and over at fsdts two topics that are polls, look at the scenerys that are listed in them. BIG airports, that will draw alot of customers. LAX, SAN, PHX, IAH, DEN, EWR, YYZ, etc... Sure they may or may not be interesting, but they will draw sales. I personally think complaining about sales being weak is a two sided considering the past few airports that have been released by you guys.
I think you all should also look into getting FSDTS type of installer, I hear they are VERY hard to crack.
Just my thoughts.
Athens good enough lol I mean its Greece a place full of rich history and a beautiful Country beautiful woman!george[flytampa] wrote:bkircher wrote:George, not to be rude, but you are kind of digging your own grave here or shooting yourself in the foot. You say that sales are not as good as compared to sales in the past, and I agree piracy is a bigggggg issue here. But when you ask for requests about the next airport, I totally understand where you are coming from with wanting to make an intersting airport, but do you really think there is a big market for the last few places that you have released?? Buf and the greidiens(or how ever you spell it). THose are regional airports, granted yes they are interesting thats for sure, but not a major demand in the market. If you look throughout this topic and over at fsdts two topics that are polls, look at the scenerys that are listed in them. BIG airports, that will draw alot of customers. LAX, SAN, PHX, IAH, DEN, EWR, YYZ, etc... Sure they may or may not be interesting, but they will draw sales. I personally think complaining about sales being weak is a two sided considering the past few airports that have been released by you guys.
I think you all should also look into getting FSDTS type of installer, I hear they are VERY hard to crack.
Just my thoughts.
HI bkircher, the thing is I completely understand where you are coming from and believe me i d love to work on something so big in the future, but the thing is they are a bit too big for me in my present situation, or they are being done by someone else. How about we reach a consensus here and go for something in the middle which is neither too big nor too small like....Athens?
Or YUL? Same scale as ATH. Although with either ATH or YUL sales will be very good. Many European users would gobble up ATH while NA customers (and Europeans) would jump on YUL....george[flytampa] wrote:bkircher wrote:George, not to be rude, but you are kind of digging your own grave here or shooting yourself in the foot. You say that sales are not as good as compared to sales in the past, and I agree piracy is a bigggggg issue here. But when you ask for requests about the next airport, I totally understand where you are coming from with wanting to make an intersting airport, but do you really think there is a big market for the last few places that you have released?? Buf and the greidiens(or how ever you spell it). THose are regional airports, granted yes they are interesting thats for sure, but not a major demand in the market. If you look throughout this topic and over at fsdts two topics that are polls, look at the scenerys that are listed in them. BIG airports, that will draw alot of customers. LAX, SAN, PHX, IAH, DEN, EWR, YYZ, etc... Sure they may or may not be interesting, but they will draw sales. I personally think complaining about sales being weak is a two sided considering the past few airports that have been released by you guys.
I think you all should also look into getting FSDTS type of installer, I hear they are VERY hard to crack.
Just my thoughts.
HI bkircher, the thing is I completely understand where you are coming from and believe me i d love to work on something so big in the future, but the thing is they are a bit too big for me in my present situation, or they are being done by someone else. How about we reach a consensus here and go for something in the middle which is neither too big nor too small like....Athens?
Actually, now that you mention it, Tucson is a great small airport and it serves both the Southwest fans and military crowd.newmanix wrote:I personally would go for Athens because I like to do the island hopping down there. And I know you would do a kick ass job. Perhaps you could add the surrounding IFR/VFR islands as well like St. Maarten? That would appeal to both FS9/X users... I think...
I still think KGEG is a nice small airport but unsure about it's popularity. Every one and their grandmothers keep asking for something in Canada so I think something Canadian is a good way to go popularity wise...
The southwest needs development. KPHX would be a very good choice regionwise with the new KSAN, KLAS, KLAX, and KDFW nearby.. But as you said no$$
Maybe Tuson or Albuqerque IDK...
My second choice for a US airport would be KPIT. Pittsburg is a very good region to put an airport in the US. It's surrounded by ImagineSim sceneries and very close to the NY/Eastern Seabord airports and the upcomming KPHL. By best bet is KPIT. It's small and in a very good location.
Sure you could do that, I persoanlly would not buy it as per I rarely fly internationally. But out of all the big name places that are listed here and at FSDT, not all of them are being done. IAH/LAX looks to be like one of FSDTS next projects, but after that you could pick one. I know EWR would sell very well. Im trying not to lobby for a specific airport, but if I were, I would be requesting PHX every day because that is the biggest airport that is closest to where I live that has yet to be done since Simflyers.HI bkircher, the thing is I completely understand where you are coming from and believe me i d love to work on something so big in the future, but the thing is they are a bit too big for me in my present situation, or they are being done by someone else. How about we reach a consensus here and go for something in the middle which is neither too big nor too small like....Athens?Top
Bob Hope and John Wayne...Brillant idea if I say so myself.newmanix wrote:KBUR is another great idea and i'd include John Wayne airport too...
A nice picture with city buildings: http://www.visitingdc.com/airports/john ... ddress.asp
Aren't those FS9?gabrielbasco wrote:I have Shez Ansari's SoCal airports and they're pretty good on the freeware tip. I wouldn't mind an SNA or ONT from FlyTampa though. MHT or BDL in the northeast are surrounded by other sceneries to hop around. RNO or FAT in the west also.