Future scenerys and possible scenery updates for fsx

[tors]

Hi again!

It´s strange that it can´t be open, it works fine on my computer. Let´s try it again.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0870078/M/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0370096/M/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1140951/M/

Best regards.
Þ.Þ.S.

[martin[flytampa]]

Keflavik is nice, I thought about doing it before. May happen one day.

[george[flytampa]]

I flew through Kef 2 years ago. Its a really nice airport.

I took a picture of my plane before leaving LHR....

[tors]

George!

Please, please!!, consider it to make Keflavík airport, it would be just superb. You are the best in this buiseness. I would buy him for 50 euros, and I am sure that many people would do (specially here in Iceland). Hope you really do.

Regards.
Þórður Þ. Sigurjónsson
Keflavík, Iceland

[fsisland]

I would buy him for 50 euros

Things ain't cheap in Iceland but I would not buy this one for that price. However for a reasonable price it will be on my sim for sure.

Best regards, Kjartan.

[WEAJHD]

I know i buy it, makes a good point in using the captainsim 757 in icelandair colours (when they eventually release their block F/D), and i can make a pitstop there on my way across the atlantic

[fjshepherd]

I know i buy it, makes a good point in using the captainsim 757 in icelandair colours (when they eventually release their block F/D), and i can make a pitstop there on my way across the atlantic

Although Keflavik would be good, )and btw use the PS 757 you get everything in one package and it runs better than the captain sim which flies like a cessna), I think many find New York Kennedy Intl (KJFK) a more pressing concern.

[WEAJHD]

I know i buy it, makes a good point in using the captainsim 757 in icelandair colours (when they eventually release their block F/D), and i can make a pitstop there on my way across the atlantic

Although Keflavik would be good, )and btw use the PS 757 you get everything in one package and it runs better than the captain sim which flies like a cessna), I think many find New York Kennedy Intl (KJFK) a more pressing concern.

Got the PSS too, but the virtual cockpit is not that good when it comes to FPS, and im using VC only with my track IR

I dont know if they will make KJFK, it have been stated earlier that this region is a frame pit, where you dont get too good frames, but lets see what happens, i'd be happy with a good KJFK scenery as well

But i personally think that BIKF will come out a long time before they make KJFK (If they ever make any of the sceneries) as BIKF is alot smaller and its an airport thats almost been untouched by the flightsim community

[Icelandair757]

Hey, what gate was that plane on LHR? When was the pic taken?

[george[flytampa]]

Don't know the gate number but its at Terminal1. The date was Nov 25th 2004.

[wilhelmsson]

Creating an addon that runs in both Sims requires an extreme amount of extra work then just doing it for either one or the other.

That's why we only need TNCM for FS9.

I have FsX and it runs fine, my settings are on high and I am still getting 20 FPS with Fly Tampa's TNCM. There are a lot of people that enjoy FsX because their system can handle it. So I don't really understand why you want the sceneries only to be compatitable with FS9 if there are 2 versions of the product, a FsX one and a FS9 one. Just buy the FS9 one and don't look at the FsX one.

[wilhelmsson]

I know i buy it, makes a good point in using the captainsim 757 in icelandair colours (when they eventually release their block F/D), and i can make a pitstop there on my way across the atlantic

Although Keflavik would be good, )and btw use the PS 757 you get everything in one package and it runs better than the captain sim which flies like a cessna), I think many find New York Kennedy Intl (KJFK) a more pressing concern.

Ya KJFK , Kennedy intl. or one of the nicest airports in Europe like LFPG, Charles De Gaulle.

[skydvdan]

Creating an addon that runs in both Sims requires an extreme amount of extra work then just doing it for either one or the other.

That's why we only need TNCM for FS9.

I have FsX and it runs fine, my settings are on high and I am still getting 20 FPS with Fly Tampa's TNCM. There are a lot of people that enjoy FsX because their system can handle it. So I don't really understand why you want the sceneries only to be compatitable with FS9 if there are 2 versions of the product, a FsX one and a FS9 one. Just buy the FS9 one and don't look at the FsX one.

First, (and I'm going to try to be nice here), I said that because if it wasn't for Martin having to create a FSX version as well as the FS9 version this scenery would have been out long ago. FSX is a broke-ass sim as it stands. Yes, there is a SP1 coming out but that still doesn't guarantee that it will run as well as FS9. Second, I personally wouldn't call 20 FPS fine. I get 50+ at TNCM in FS9. Third, don't try to make yourself look like a hero by pulling up posts from 3 months ago to try to call me out. In the end you just make yourself look like a fanboy.

So I don't really understand why you want the sceneries only to be compatitable with FS9...

If you don't get it then you never will. Just let it go so that I can stay nice to you.

[george[flytampa]]

I know i buy it, makes a good point in using the captainsim 757 in icelandair colours (when they eventually release their block F/D), and i can make a pitstop there on my way across the atlantic

Although Keflavik would be good, )and btw use the PS 757 you get everything in one package and it runs better than the captain sim which flies like a cessna), I think many find New York Kennedy Intl (KJFK) a more pressing concern.

Ya KJFK , Kennedy intl. or one of the nicest airports in Europe like LFPG, Charles De Gaulle.

JFK & Paris run at 5fps in FSX with resonable effects turned on.
Staying well away from those areas.