Aaron Jackson's af2_flytampa_kmdw.zip

specialist · Post by **specialist** » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:35 pm

Has anyone used this AFCAD file yet, and are you having any problems with it? So far, the thing I've noticed is that I see SWA parked at ATA parking spots. I didn't see that before.

MD11Forever · Post by **MD11Forever** » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:39 pm

Maybe gate assignments changed at KMDW? Not sure how that is all working down there now, with ATA more or less a SWA subsidiary.

vegasflyboy2004 · Post by **vegasflyboy2004** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:14 am

His readme says he didn't touch the parking assignments, so who knows?

Capt.Ed · Post by **Capt.Ed** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:07 am

I have noticed when I updated my Ultimate Traffic schedule for summer 2006 that there is more SWA jets parked over by the ATA terminal also.
I dont think this is a problem because of SWA now owning ATA and are taking over some of their flights.

Dont worry,its normal.

specialist · Post by **specialist** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:53 am

Capt.Ed wrote:I have noticed when I updated my Ultimate Traffic schedule for summer 2006 that there is more SWA jets parked over by the ATA terminal also.
I dont think this is a problem because of SWA now owning ATA and are taking over some of their flights.

Dont worry,its normal.

That is the most likely answer, because I too have the summer 2006 update for Ultimate Traffic. Thanks for your inputs!

MD11Forever · Post by **MD11Forever** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:29 pm

Or it could simply be inaccurate parking code lines in the UT cfg files.

I certainly wouldn't call it normal because in my non-UT traffic, my stuff is parking at the right spots.

Obi-1-kenobi · Post by **Obi-1-kenobi** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:26 pm

Capt.Ed wrote: because of SWA now owning ATA and are taking over some of their flights

It's a codeshare, ATA is not owned by WN.

Ruahrc · Post by **Ruahrc** » Sun Aug 27, 2006 5:25 pm

Or more likely just that there are more SWA flights in the new schedules than the AFCAD can support. Once FS9 fills all available SWA spots with aircraft and there are more planes to put in, it starts putting them at other parking locations until the airport is full.

Ruahrc

Obi-1-kenobi · Post by **Obi-1-kenobi** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:20 pm

Ruahrc wrote:Or more likely just that there are more SWA flights in the new schedules than the AFCAD can support. Once FS9 fills all available SWA spots with aircraft and there are more planes to put in, it starts putting them at other parking locations until the airport is full.

Ruahrc

If I remeber right TZ gave WN some of their gates in the codehare deal.

swapilot · Post by **swapilot** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:08 am

Obi-1-kenobi wrote:If I remeber right TZ gave WN some of their gates in the codehare deal.

Southwest paid for those gates, it was part of the bankruptcy reorganization. SWA outbid AirTran for them.

Aaron Jackson's af2_flytampa_kmdw.zip

Aaron Jackson's af2_flytampa_kmdw.zip

SWA Parking with new afcad

Re: SWA Parking with new afcad

Re: SWA Parking with new afcad