The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post Reply
f0x
Posts: 5

The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by f0x » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:43 am

Hey guys!

To give george and his team a rough idea of how many potential customers they have on this board that are looking for a lightweight-version of FlyTampa's newest YSSY scenery for FS9, I open this thread so that you guys can make a sign too and hope your voices will be heard. ;)
Side note: We do not want any "FS9 is dead, move to P3d"-argument here!

So to FlyTampa:
Consider me a definite buyer of a version for FS9!
SydneyGround
Posts: 4

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by SydneyGround » Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:30 am

+1 for me too !
tk92
Posts: 14

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by tk92 » Sat Jun 13, 2015 6:42 am

That makes three :)
Benncpp15
Posts: 161

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by Benncpp15 » Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:52 am

and this is probably the remaining three fs9 users. lol.

Upgrade you old misers.
tk92
Posts: 14

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by tk92 » Sat Jun 13, 2015 9:35 am

@Benncpp15

Shouldn't you be posting to another thread about OOM's and low FPS? :wink:

Now serious: this is just a polite question for Flytampa and we didn't ask for someone's opinion who is using FSX. You have your new airport already so I don't get your problem.
Benncpp15
Posts: 161

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by Benncpp15 » Sat Jun 13, 2015 9:56 am

No OOMs at Sydney yet. Only done the one flight PMDG NGX but loved it.
Jeremy
Posts: 33

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by Jeremy » Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:25 am

+1
edetroit
Posts: 111

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by edetroit » Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:50 am

+1

Not sure that many FS9 niners come to a forum that allows the behaviour of children like our Benn :)

George knows that pretty much all FS niners would be after his scenery. It is just a question of whether he wishes to make it work.
troykr
Posts: 18

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by troykr » Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:36 pm

Yes No OOMS for me either as compared to Toronto which I could hardly even load let alone fly. Must be something to do with overload of Vector information on the American continent vs Oceania I reckon.
george[flytampa]
Site Admin
Posts: 3309

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by george[flytampa] » Sat Jun 13, 2015 8:38 pm

Toronto does have a much great hit from Orbx's Vector.
Davie
Posts: 11

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by Davie » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:06 am

+1 for an FS9 version whatever the price is.
mcbellette
Posts: 56

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by mcbellette » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:14 am

Shouldn't it be the unofficial, not inoffical?
Pitts_S2B
Posts: 1

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by Pitts_S2B » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:33 pm

Even though I will likely buy the FSX version anyway for my Steam install, I would welcome an FS9 version too. The thought of a FlyTampa-quality version of that airport teeming with AI traffic and 30 locked fps at the completion of a long-haul flight is very appealing.


John G.
ArturAir
Posts: 27

Re: The (in)official FS9-begging-thread

Post by ArturAir » Sun Jun 14, 2015 3:06 pm

+1 for FS9
Post Reply