kaisy26 wrote: ↑

Mon Apr 08, 2019 12:53 am

Hi,

I don't understand. What you actually want to say ??
Thanks...

I don't understand what your saying either. I'm asking for the Central Florida area to go along with the already created 'FlyTampa' area/airport.

Everyone knows the two most noted specialized vacation cities in the world are Las Vegas (for adults) and Orlando (for family). It would be fitting to have these two covered by FlyTampa especially since Vegas has already been done. Here's hoping central Florida is considered by Fly Tampa. We already...

Since Vegas is coming along fantastic I was wondering why not do another dedicated entertainment city which is the Orlando area. Vegas is the adult entertainment capital of the world why not do the family entertainment capital of the world. Orlando would be a great companion to Vegas from the space ...

I'd like to add my hat in the ring for an FS9 version of YSSY. Toronto would be nice as well if possible.

why should I change from a ten year old sim to an eight year old sim when todays hardware can't handle it? lol Todays hardware is a bit better than the one your mother bought you from the Staples bargain basement. FSX can be maxed out now. PMDG NGX, Quality scenery, HD clouds, Smooooooth, Bliss.......

athenian wrote:Sorry for asking, but what quality aircraft and NOT toys, does FS9 have, apart from the Leonardo Maddog?

I am talking about PMDG, or Level-D or FS-Labs quality.

If you have to ask that question the jokes on you...

And what was this topic about again, aha, Copenhagen Airport...... :D Please stop this nonsense about FSX vs FS9 in this topic, take a phone call and discuss it there instead.... :evil: Btw, i'm really looking forward to this scenery.... :wink: Brgds Stein-Ove Norway Hey, I didn't start it... :wink:

How come you guys are still using FS9? WTF, its 2013. Very simple in 2013: 1. FSX 'STILL' doesn't have the volume of aircraft and scenery FS9 has (even if FlyTampa doesn't do this airport for FS9 we have 4 other versions to choose from). 2. There's no real incentive to move from FS9, here's the rea...

After updating my computer to Windows 7 last year I didn't do a full reinstall of KSAN as the scenery can back in place and everything worked when carried everything over from my XP installation. As of today I have no way to fully remove KSAN outside of shutting down the entry in FS9. What I'm findi...

mug_c wrote:Orbx Pacific Northwest spruces up KPAE quite a bit - not to full addon quality - but better than default for sure.

As an FS9 user this version I'm sure will not work in my setup.

Thanks to Aerosoft we have Airbus's manufacturing base georgously rendered in FS9/FSX but a detailed Paine Field Washington is no where to be found. It would be nice if some developer balanced the scale (a slight hint to Fly Tampa as I know you guys would nail this on)...

phenocom wrote:

Nzeddy wrote:Default NZ is yucky. Orbx has New Zealand South Island out now and North Island sometime this year.

Have you tried the NZAA for FS9? If it works it looks decent.

Can you point me to where an FS9 version of NZAA is? I'm sure it's not on the level of FlyTampa's work.

Can someone tell me why no developer want's to do New Zealand's main major international airport. I'd love to see FlyTampa do it but this one doesn't seem to be on the agenda. Martin you know no one has ever done Auckland International for FS in any version I believe (certainly nothing professional ...

I was getting excited about this until I saw it was for FSX only...

Hopefully someone will do a version of Auckland for both sims (FS9/FSX) in the not so distant future.