Air France A340-300 has just enough fuel to fly back to Paris, KLM is now making a stop with the MD-11 at Aruba, they changed the 744 from st. maarten-->curacao-->amsterdam to a MD-11 which firt goes to Aruba and than heads back to Amsterdam and I think Corsair makes a stop at TFFF or TFFR too.

Again, when you dig up a post that I made from 3 months ago to try to call me out then you will get the response that you did. You played FS9 once? You don't even know what you're talking about then. You obviously value eye candy over an actual playable sim. Anyone that thinks that 20 fps is good p...

First, (and I'm going to try to be nice here), I said that because if it wasn't for Martin having to create a FSX version as well as the FS9 version this scenery would have been out long ago. FSX is a broke-ass sim as it stands. Yes, there is a SP1 coming out but that still doesn't guarantee that i...

Although Keflavik would be good, )and btw use the PS 757 you get everything in one package and it runs better than the captain sim which flies like a cessna), I think many find New York Kennedy Intl (KJFK) a more pressing concern. Ya KJFK , Kennedy intl. or one of the nicest airports in Europe like...

That's why we only need TNCM for FS9. :twisted: I have FsX and it runs fine, my settings are on high and I am still getting 20 FPS with Fly Tampa's TNCM. There are a lot of people that enjoy FsX because their system can handle it. So I don't really understand why you want the sceneries only to be c...

I know i buy it, makes a good point in using the captainsim 757 in icelandair colours (when they eventually release their block F/D), and i can make a pitstop there on my way across the atlantic :) Although Keflavik would be good, )and btw use the PS 757 you get everything in one package and it run...

Creating an addon that runs in both Sims requires an extreme amount of extra work then just doing it for either one or the other. That's why we only need TNCM for FS9. :twisted: I have FsX and it runs fine, my settings are on high and I am still getting 20 FPS with Fly Tampa's TNCM. There are a lot...

Just FYI eee722, As I was reading the PDF manual, it mentions that the old TNCM Terminal is considered a Land Mark and will not be removed . I haven't had a chance to load the scenery yet, but look forward to it. Anyway, I hope this cleared that part up for you. I hope you get things sorted out wit...

Hello Fly Tampa,

I have noticed that some of the users have an Fsx version of the complete scenery. I was trying to purchase it but I couldn't find the FsX version, or is the FsX version included in the complete FS2004 version?

Thanks,,

Roy

Manny wrote:St. Barths for FS9 is a masterpiece...

BTW.. does anyone know what is the biggest aircraft that lands here for real?

I can't land the King air. But the Caranado 182 is fine.



Manny

the DHC 6-300 Winair

And I will buy this scenery whem I got my FsX back to working

ya you're right

I would especially liek to see some Saba screenshots since we haven't seen anything about Saba. Here you go. And also a map. Do you see a little red arrow in one of the shots? This is where Martin is right now, trying to finish the scenery. I am sure we will see some greyish/white smoke very soon, ...

I would especially liek to see some Saba screenshots since we haven't seen anything about Saba. I am also just like you guys looking forward for the release.

Why do you guys all hate FsX is it because your system isn't good enough? I can play it with everything setted high and still get 20 FPS at the ground around major airports. Sorry but I just want to know this because at high everything looks very nice?